(970) 353-0000
menu

Client Success Stories

Dismissed
DUI/DWAI
People v. P.S.
Client was charged with DUI and Weaving. 我们提交了动议，要求撤销大部分证据，理由是停车失误. 法院批准了我们的动议，地方检察官驳回了此案.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. B.E.
Client was charged with DUI and Open Container. 我们提交了动议要求撤销证据基于错误的拦截和强制陈述. 法院批准了我们的动议，地方检察官驳回了此案.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. J.H.
客户被控吸毒和超速. 我们认为给予委托人的化学测试无效且无意义. The DA conceded and dismissed the case.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. S.M.
Client had two DUI cases within a few weeks. 我们在车管所的听证会上击败了这两起案件，并向法庭提出动议，帮助我们在这两起案件中获得了DWAIs和软禁，而不是县监狱或工作释放.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. S.D.
Client was charged with DUI and Speeding. 我们在车管所打了败诉并说服地方检察官允许客户对鲁莽驾驶的指控进行抗辩并驳回酒驾和超速的指控.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. B.S.
当事人被控酒后驾车和遮挡窗户. Client had one prior DWAI. 我们提出动议挑战呼气测试的有效性由于一个错误的结果和其他抑制动议. Rather than fight us, 地方检察官规定了DWAI和软禁，而不是县监狱或工作释放.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. J.T.
Client had two DUI cases within a few weeks. 我们提出动议，要求隐匿证据并达成了有利的认罪协议结果我们的委托人被软禁而不是被关进监狱或被释放工作.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. E.B.
当事人被控酒后驾车和粗心驾驶. 客户在过去11年中有3次酒驾/酒后驾车. 我们把这件事推到了开庭那天我们达成了一项有利的辩诉交易我们的当事人没有被判入狱, no alcohol classes and probation.
Dismissed
DUI / DWAI
People v. R.G.
Client had two DWAIs with a few weeks. Client had four prior DUIs/DWAIs. 我们与地方检察官就此事进行了谈判，并说服地方检察官驳回了一个案件，并向另一个DWAI提出请求，只有四个月的工作释放.
Dismissed
Domestic Violence
People v. O.C.
Client was charged with Assault-DV. 在审判中，我们质疑了受害者的清醒和警方调查不力. The jury found the client Not Guilty.
Dismissed
Domestic Violence
People v. A.O.
Client was charged with Harassment-DV. 在审判中，我们对受害者对事件的回忆以及警方缺乏调查提出了质疑. The jury found the client Not Guilty.
Dismissed
Domestic Violence
People v. D.H.
当事人被控侵犯家庭暴力、骚扰家庭暴力和威胁家庭暴力. 在庭审中，我们质疑了受害者的陈述包括她对我方当事人的偏见. 我们还利用了警官未能正确采访和认可独立证人的问题. 陪审团裁定当事人所有罪名均无罪.
Dismissed
Domestic Violence
People v. N.R.
Client was charged with Assault-DV. 我们提出的动议被批准了限制了地方检察官的证据. 地方检察官以未能履行职责为由驳回了此案.
Dismissed
Domestic Violence
People v. K.T.
Client was charged with Assault-DV. 我们质疑受害人陈述的真实性包括双方离婚诉讼中的问题. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Domestic Violence
People v. W.S.
Client was charged with Assault-DV. 我们质疑受害者的可靠性，包括受害者之前提出的令人难以置信的索赔. 我们提出了许多证据动议，为案件的成功审判做好了准备. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Assault
People v. M.J.
当事人被指控侵犯，骚扰和虐待儿童. 在审判中，我们对受害者和证人的证词提出了质疑. Additionally, 我们盘问了警官，使他承认了, out of apparent laziness, 他未能获得并保存整个事件的监控录像. 陪审团裁定当事人所有罪名均无罪.
Dismissed
Assault
People v. E.J.
当事人被控伤害罪，至少会被判五年监禁. Through our investigation, 我们找到了11位之前不知名的证人他们的证词证明了我们的委托人无罪. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Assault
People v. R.D.
当事人被控伤害罪和妨害治安罪. 我们向地方检察官辩解说我们的当事人是在为他人辩护而所谓的受害者实际上是主要的攻击者. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Assault
People v. M.A.
当事人被控两项袭击和妨害治安罪. 我们在法庭上辩称地方检察官未能妥善保存并移交证明委托人清白的重要证据. 结果，法院撤销了所有指控.
Dismissed
Assault
People v. F.C.
Client was charged with Assault. 我们向地方检察官辩解说委托人完全是出于自卫. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Assault
People v. C.F.
Client was charged with Assault. 我们向地方检察官辩解说，这是由于警方的错误调查, 没有足够的证据证明我方当事人有罪. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Theft / Burglary / Trespass
People v. S.C.
Client was charged with Theft. At trial, 我们对地检官的理论进行了仔细的交叉询问, 证明客户与盗窃没有任何关系. 陪审团仅用了六分钟就裁定委托人无罪.
Dismissed
Theft / Burglary / Trespass
People v. J.M.
Client was charged with Vehicle Theft. At trial, 我们质疑证人对事实的回忆以及警察未能对案件进行适当调查. 陪审团仅在12分钟内就裁定委托人无罪.
Dismissed
Theft / Burglary / Trespass
People v. M.S.
Client was charged with Trespass. At trial, 我们传唤了自己的证人来质疑地检官人气最高的真人网赌软件推荐的当事人知道他不应该出现在那个地点的说法. The jury found the client Not Guilty.
Dismissed
Theft / Burglary / Trespass
People v. J.K.
Client was charged with 13 counts of Burglary. 地方检察官准备再起诉40多项盗窃罪, Criminal Mischief, 持有盗窃工具并协助未成年人犯罪, 这会让当事人有资格被判几百年监禁吗. We negotiated a favorable plea, 结果只工作了90天就被释放，缓刑尽管地方检察官要求判多年监禁.
Dismissed
Theft / Burglary / Trespass
People v. R.W.
Client was charged with Trespass to a Dwelling. 我们向地方检察官辩解说，原告的证人因为与我方当事人的关系而有偏见，而他们的其他证人也不可信. The DA agreed and dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Theft / Burglary / Trespass
People in the Interest of M.M.
Client was charged with Theft. 通过我们的调查，我们发现客户与盗窃案没有任何关系，而且地方检察官也不可能证明这一案件. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Drugs
People v. A.E.
当事人被指控种植大麻, Possession of an Illegal Weapon, 未成年人管有(MIP)及管有毒品用具. 我们提供了证据证明我们的委托人是一名有执照的看护人，他的病人被授权以药用为目的使用大麻. 地方检察官驳回了所有与毒品有关的指控.
Dismissed
Drugs
People v. R.S.
当事人被指控持有大麻和毒品用具. 我们提出了多项动议要求隐瞒证据包括不正当搜查和扣押动议. 法庭批准了我们的动议，并取消了所有证据. 地方检察官没有留下任何确凿的证据，于是驳回了此案.
Dismissed
Drugs
People v. Z.M.
Client was charged with Possession of Marijuana. 客户准备成为一名教师，但由于有前科，他不可能成为一名教师. 我们说服了地方检察官允许委托人接受治疗. 客户成功地完成了治疗，地方检察官驳回了此案.
Dismissed
Alcohol
People v. D.K.
当事人被指控向未成年人提供酒精饮料. 我们向地方检察官辩解说我们的委托人不可能提供酒精因为有那么多目击者在场而且警方处理这件事的方式也很不正当. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Alcohol
People in the Interest of A.E.
客户被控违反保护令及管有未成年人(MIP). 我们提出了许多动议来质疑证据. 法院同意了我们的动议并批准了，这限制了地检所能获得的证据. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Alcohol
People v. J.M.
客户被控持有未成年人罪. 我们认为，我方当事人所遭受的后果已经足以作为适当的惩罚. The DA agreed and dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Alcohol
People v. A.D.
在同一事件中，客户被控未成年人持有(MIP).M. (above). 我们认为地方检察官唯一能做的公平的事情就是驳回这个案子因为他们驳回了J.M.’s case. The DA agreed and dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Traffic
People v. A.C.
客户被控违规驾驶(DUR)和粗心驾驶，并在新指控的基础上提出了撤销其家庭暴力缓刑的申诉. 我们让地检官相信被害人的车受到的损害很小而且有保险. Also, 我们说服了地检官提出认罪协议允许非法驾驶不撤销缓刑. This plea only cost our client $137, zero points against his driving privilege, and the ability to keep his driver’s license.
Dismissed
Traffic
People v. K.A.
当事人被控过失致伤罪. 我们说服了地方检察官，根据证据没有办法证明指控，所有的伤害都在保险范围内. The DA dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Traffic
People v. B.J.
Client was charged with Speeding. We pushed this case to trial. 法院认为，由于证据不足，原告不能继续审理此案，并驳回了此案.
Dismissed
Traffic
People v. C.R.
委托人被指控离开事故现场. 这是一个12分的违规，这将暂停客户的驾驶执照. 我们让地方检察官相信，他们的案子出了问题，因为警察和当事人的身份. 当事人签订了辩诉交易，承认了车辆缺陷罪, a non-moving violation, 违章两分外加诉讼费和小额罚款.
Dismissed
Traffic
People v. S.M.
客户被控非法驾驶(DUR)和非法掉头. 我们让地方检察官相信吊销客户执照是意外. 客户签订了认罪协议，承认允许非法驾驶. This plea only cost our client $137, zero points against her driving privilege, and the ability to keep her driver’s license.
Dismissed
Juvenile
People in the Interest of M.R.
青少年当事人被指控参与暴乱, Assault, Criminal Mischief, Hindering Transportation and Throwing Missiles. At trial, 我们对控方证人进行了彻底的盘问，这样就没有人能肯定地指出当事人做错了什么. 法院裁定当事人所有罪名均不成立.
Dismissed
Juvenile
People in the Interest of M.P.
青少年当事人被指控参与暴乱和妨害治安. 在审讯中，我们证明警官没有做彻底的调查. 法院裁定当事人所有罪名均不成立.
Dismissed
Juvenile
People in the Interest of M.A.
青少年当事人被控两项人身攻击罪. 在审判中，我们辩称公诉方未能充分证明此案. 法院裁定当事人所有罪名均不成立.
Dismissed
Juvenile
People in the Interest of C.A.
Juvenile client was charged with Assault. 我们向地方检察官辩护说证据不足以证明委托人犯了袭击罪. The DA agreed and dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Juvenile
People in the Interest of M.C.
青少年当事人被控行为不检和干扰学校运作. 我们向地方检察官辩解说委托人是出于自卫他的行为是合理的. The DA agreed and dismissed the case.
Dismissed
Sex Offenses
People v. A.A.
当事人被控非法性接触. 我们提出动议要求撤销客户的陈述并向地方检察官辩称他们无法证明这个案子. 法院驳回了委托人的陈述，地方检察官驳回了此案.
Dismissed
Animals
People v. J.G.
Client was charged with having a Barking Dog. At trial, we challenged the motive of the alleged victim, 客户没有按照要求事先通知有狗在叫，警察对案件的处理也很草率. The court found the client Not Guilty.